The Indian Journal of Fashion Technology (IJFT) is committed to ensuring the highest standards of publishing through a rigorous and transparent peer review process. Our peer review policy aims to maintain the quality, integrity, and academic value of the research published in the journal. The following outlines the peer review process:
1. Initial Submission and Screening
Upon submission, each manuscript is initially screened by the editorial team to ensure it aligns with the journal's scope and adheres to the submission guidelines. Manuscripts that do not meet these criteria are returned to the authors with feedback for necessary adjustments.
2. Double-Blind Review
The journal employs a double-blind peer review process, where both the identities of the authors and reviewers are kept confidential. This ensures an unbiased and objective evaluation of the manuscript.
3. Selection of Reviewers
The editorial team selects reviewers based on their expertise and experience in the relevant field of fashion technology. Typically, two to three reviewers are chosen to provide a comprehensive assessment of the manuscript.
4. Reviewer Evaluation
Reviewers evaluate the manuscript based on the following criteria:
• Originality and significance of the research
• Clarity and coherence of the presentation
• Methodological rigor and accuracy
• Relevance and contribution to the field of fashion technology
• Appropriateness of references and citations
Reviewers provide detailed comments and recommendations for improvement, which are communicated to the authors.
5. Reviewer Recommendations
Based on the reviewers' evaluations, the manuscript may receive one of the following recommendations:
• Accept as is
• Minor revisions required
• Major revisions required
• Reject
The editorial team considers the reviewers' recommendations and makes the final decision on the manuscript.
6. Revision and Resubmission
If revisions are required, the authors are given a specified period to address the reviewers' comments and resubmit the revised manuscript. The revised manuscript is typically sent back to the original reviewers for re-evaluation.
7. Final Decision
After the reviewers' re-evaluation, the editorial team makes the final decision on the manuscript's acceptance. Authors are informed of the decision along with any final comments or suggestions from the reviewers and editors.
8. Appeals
Authors have the right to appeal editorial decisions. Appeals must be submitted in writing, providing detailed justification and any additional information or clarifications. The editorial team reviews the appeal and makes a final decision.
9. Confidentiality
All manuscripts and review materials are treated as confidential documents. Reviewers and editorial team members are required to maintain confidentiality and not disclose any information about the manuscript or the review process.
10. Ethical Considerations
The journal adheres to ethical guidelines and best practices in scholarly publishing. Any suspected ethical misconduct, such as plagiarism or data fabrication, is investigated thoroughly, and appropriate actions are taken.